How to Run Entrepreneurship Competitions: Behind The Scenes of a New Venture Competition
How To Run Entrepreneurship Competitions Behind the Scenes of a New Venture Competition
Entrepreneurship competitions are essential platforms for fostering innovation and identifying the next wave of successful startups. However, as these competitions grow in size and complexity, managing them effectively becomes increasingly challenging. In this article, we’ll explore how to structure your entrepreneurship competition from start to finish, drawing insights from a recent webinar titled “How to Run Entrepreneurship Competitions in 2024.” We’ll delve into best practices for setting up company submissions, structuring judging processes, and leveraging technology to streamline operations and elevate participant experiences.
The Evolving Landscape of Entrepreneurship Competitions
The world of entrepreneurship competitions has evolved dramatically over the past decade. While the core objective remains the same—to identify and nurture innovative ideas—the tools and processes used to achieve this have undergone significant changes. With the rise of technology, participants now expect more than just basic submission forms and email communications. They seek a seamless, engaging experience that allows them to showcase their ideas effectively and securely.
Structuring Your Competition: A Step-by-Step Guide
One of the most critical aspects of running a successful competition is structuring the process efficiently. This involves careful planning of the submission process, designing multi-round judging workflows, and ensuring a fair and consistent judging process.
Structuring The Submission Process
The submission process is the first point of interaction between participants and your competition. To create an effective submission process, consider the following steps:
1.Multi-Phase Submissions:
Instead of requiring participants to submit all their materials upfront, consider a multi-phase submission process. In Phase One, ask for basic information such as team details, a high-level summary of their business, and the problem they’re trying to solve. This allows you to filter out non-viable entries early on without overwhelming participants.
As teams advance to subsequent phases, request more detailed submissions such as business plans, pitch decks, and financial projections. This approach reduces the initial burden on participants and ensures that only the most serious contenders invest the time in preparing detailed submissions.
2. Intent to Apply Forms:
An intent to apply form can be a great way to gauge interest and collect initial information from potential participants. This form can capture basic details such as the team leader’s name, the institution they’re affiliated with, and a brief description of their business idea. This allows you to keep a pulse on potential applicants and plan accordingly.
3. Collaborative Submission Process:
Allow teams to collaborate on their submissions by providing them with a platform where they can work together in real-time. This not only makes the process more efficient but also helps to improve the quality of submissions.
4. Iterative Feedback and Updates:
Incorporate feedback loops into the submission process. After the initial phase, provide participants with feedback and allow them to make improvements before moving on to the next phase. This iterative process not only helps participants refine their ideas but also improves the overall quality of the competition.
Designing Multi-Round Judging Workflows
Multi-round judging workflows are crucial for competitions that involve several stages of evaluation. These workflows ensure that the most promising participants progress through each stage, receiving feedback and guidance along the way.
Phase-Based Judging:
Organize your competition into multiple phases, each with its own judging criteria and requirements. For example:
- Phase One: Initial screening based on high-level summaries and team details.
- Phase Two: Detailed evaluations of business plans, financials, and pitch decks.
- Phase Three: Live pitch events where finalists present their ideas to a panel of judges.
By breaking the competition into phases, you can focus the judges’ efforts on the most promising entries, providing deeper analysis and feedback as participants advance.
Incorporating Live Pitch Elements:
Live pitch events are a critical component of many entrepreneurship competitions. These events give participants the opportunity to present their ideas in person (or virtually) to a panel of judges. Within a platform like Reviewer, you can seamlessly integrate live pitch elements into your judging workflow.
During the live pitch phase, judges can use the platform to review participants’ profiles, access their submissions, and input scores in real-time as they watch the presentations. This ensures that the evaluation process is consistent across all phases of the competition.
Real-Time Feedback and Updates:
Throughout the competition, participants should receive feedback from judges that they can use to refine their submissions. For example, after the initial judging phase, participants might receive suggestions for improving their business plans or pitch decks. They can then update their submissions before moving on to the next phase. This iterative process helps ensure that participants are constantly improving and that the final submissions are of the highest quality.
Assigning Submissions to Judges
Once the submissions are in, the next step is to assign them to judges. Here’s how to do it effectively:
Create Judging Buckets:
Categorize submissions into judging buckets based on criteria such as industry, stage of development, or competition track. This allows you to assign judges with the relevant expertise to the appropriate submissions. For example, you might have a technology bucket, a social innovation bucket, and a consumer products bucket.
Workload Management:
To prevent judge fatigue, manage the workload carefully. Most judges can effectively evaluate around 10-15 submissions before their focus starts to wane. Use software tools to automatically assign a manageable number of submissions to each judge, ensuring that no judge is overwhelmed.
Automate Assignments Where Possible:
Leverage automation tools to assign submissions to judges based on predefined criteria. For example, you can set rules to ensure that each submission is reviewed by a minimum number of judges or that certain judges are assigned to specific categories based on their expertise.
Manage Conflicts of Interest:
Be proactive in identifying and managing conflicts of interest. Judges should not be assigned submissions where they have a personal or professional relationship with the participants. Use your software platform to flag potential conflicts and reassign submissions as needed.
Conducting the Judging Process
The judging process is where the rubber meets the road. A well-structured judging process ensures fairness and consistency while providing valuable feedback to participants. Here’s how to set it up:
Align Scorecards with Submission Forms:
Ensure that your judging scorecards are aligned with the information provided in the submission forms. For example, if judges are evaluating a business plan, the scorecard should have sections that correspond to each part of the plan—problem statement, solution, market analysis, financials, etc.
Use Emotional Response Scoring:
Instead of relying solely on point scales, consider using emotional response scoring. For instance, instead of asking judges to rate a business’s market strategy on a scale from 1-20, you might ask them to rate it from “below average” to “exemplary.” This approach can elicit more honest and nuanced feedback, which can then be converted into point values behind the scenes.
Real-Time Tracking:
Use a platform like Reviewer to track the judging process in real-time. This is especially important for live pitch events where you need to tabulate results quickly. Real-time tracking lets you see who has completed their evaluations and who the highest-rated participants are.
Normalizing Judging Scores:
To ensure fairness, especially in multi-phase or multi-judge scenarios, it’s important to account for differences in how judges score. Some judges tend to score higher or lower than others, which can skew results. By using normalization techniques, you can adjust scores based on each judge’s average scoring pattern. This helps level the playing field, ensuring that no participant is unfairly advantaged or disadvantaged by the luck of the draw.
Normalization works by analyzing the average scores given by each judge and adjusting them so that all judges are effectively scoring on the same scale. For example, if Judge A tends to score all entries higher than Judge B, normalization will adjust Judge A’s scores downward and Judge B’s scores upward to ensure that they are comparable.
Providing Feedback to Participants:
Judges should leave detailed comments and feedback that can be shared with participants after the competition. This feedback is invaluable for participants, as it helps them understand their strengths and areas for improvement.
Facilitating the Live Pitch Process
Integrating live pitch elements into your competition can add significant value, allowing judges to evaluate participants in a dynamic, real-time setting. Here’s how to facilitate the live pitch process effectively:
Preparing Judges for Live Pitch Events:
Before the live pitch event, provide judges with access to participants’ profiles and previous submissions. This allows them to familiarize themselves with the teams they’ll be evaluating. During the live event, judges can use Reviewer to score participants in real-time, adding comments and feedback as they go.
Combining Live and Virtual Judging:
In some competitions, live pitches may be combined with virtual judging. For example, participants might submit a business plan for virtual judging, followed by a live pitch where they present their idea to a panel. Reviewer allows you to integrate both live and virtual judging seamlessly, ensuring that scores and feedback from both phases are captured and reflected in the final results.
Real-Time Score Tabulation:
During live pitch events, it’s crucial to have real-time score tabulation so that you can quickly determine the top performers. Reviewer’s platform allows you to track scores as they’re entered, providing instant visibility into which participants are leading and who might need additional deliberation.
Enhancing the Participant Experience
Ultimately, the success of your competition hinges on the experience you provide to participants. They need to feel that their submissions are being handled professionally, that their data is secure, and that they are receiving the feedback they need to improve.
Creating Comprehensive Participant Profiles:
In Reviewer, each participant or team creates a comprehensive profile that includes all their submissions, feedback, and interactions throughout the competition. This profile serves as a central hub for all their activities, allowing them to easily access and update their information as needed.
Secure File Management:
Data security is a top priority, especially when dealing with confidential business information such as financials and pitch decks. Reviewer provides robust security features that allow you to control access levels, ensuring that only authorized individuals can view sensitive information.
Facilitating Feedback and Collaboration:
Throughout the competition, participants should have the opportunity to receive feedback and collaborate with judges or mentors. Reviewer enables secure, private communication between participants and judges, allowing for real-time feedback and iterative improvements.
Running a successful entrepreneurship competition in 2024 requires more than just a passion for innovation—it requires a strategic approach to managing submissions, structuring judging workflows, and leveraging technology to create an exceptional experience for participants and judges alike. By following the steps outlined in this post and utilizing a comprehensive platform like Reviewer, you can streamline your competition process, ensure fairness, and ultimately identify the next generation of successful entrepreneurs.
If you’re interested in learning more about how Reviewer can support your competition, or if you’d like to discuss best practices for structuring your event, don’t hesitate to reach out. Our team is here to help you create a competition that not only runs smoothly but also leaves a lasting impact on all who participate.
Implement these trends today
