Turn Submissions into Decisions

AI enhanced full lifecycle platform for scholarships, grants, and awards—built to streamline operations, power smarter reviews, and drive confident selections.

How Organizations Use Reviewr

One Platform, Endless Impact

The most impactful organizations don't just run programs — they change lives, build communities, and advance missions. Reviewr is the vehicle that drives your mission.

school
Scholarships

Investing in People

Your scholarships invest in the individuals who will shape the future. Reviewr handles eligibility screening, applications, references, blind review, award decisions, multi-year renewals, and scholar outcome tracking — from first application through graduation.

Need-based
Merit-Based
Workforce Pipeline
Continuing Education
Explore Scholarship Management
arrow_forward
workspace_premium
Grants

Community Impact

Your grants fund the organizations creating change in your community. Reviewr manages the full lifecycle — LOI screening, proposal intake, panel coordination, funding decisions, post-award compliance, milestone tracking, and impact reporting. Fund with confidence. Prove the outcomes.

Community Development
Capacity Building
Project Based
Emergency Response
Explore Grant Management
arrow_forward
emoji_events
Awards

Celebrating Excellence

Your awards recognize the people and organizations advancing your mission. Reviewr provides structured nomination, evaluation, and selection workflows with the same review engine, documentation, and audit trails your other programs depend on.

Honors & Recognition
Community Awards
Chapter Awards
40 Under 40
Explore Awards Management
arrow_forward
people
Fellowships

Professional Development

Support the next generation of leaders through structured fellowship programs. Manage competitive applications, cohort selection, multi-phase evaluations, and ongoing program requirements with the same powerful tools trusted by leading organizations.

Research Fellows
Executive Programs
Emerging Leaders
Leadership Academies
Explore Fellowship Management
arrow_forward
leaderboard
Competitions

Fuel Innovation

Great competitions do more than crown a winner — they rally your community, surface ideas worth backing, and show people what's possible. Reviewr handles the logistics so you can focus on the energy. Structured submissions, standardized judging, automated scoring, and clear results mean every entrant gets a fair shot and every decision holds up to scrutiny.

Pitch Competitions
Innovation Challenges
Creative Contests
Essay Contests
Explore Competition Management
arrow_forward
campaign
Call for Entry

Deliver Better Programs

The quality of what you put on starts with who and what you let in. Reviewr brings structure to open calls of any kind — purpose-built intake forms, automated screening, coordinated review workflows, and selection tools that help the right submissions rise to the top. Whether you're collecting speaker proposals, abstracts, or vendor applications, run a process your applicants respect and your team can actually manage.

Speaker Proposals
Vendor Applications
Creative Submissions
RFPs
Explore Submission Management
arrow_forward
Sound Familiar?

A Day in the Life Without Reviewr

This isn't a bad day. This is every day.
> Scroll through to read the story
8:14 AM
An applicant emails asking if their application was received and whether their references have submitted yet. You check three different tools to piece together an answer.
8:47 AM
You open your online form tool, export all submissions to a spreadsheet, and spend the next hour manually compiling individual packets — copying, pasting, renaming files.
9:52 AM
A reviewer replies-all asking where the scoring rubric is. It was in a different email thread from two weeks ago. Two other reviewers still haven't started — they say they "didn't know it was time."
10:30 AM
A strong applicant abandons their application halfway through. You'll never know — the form tool doesn't track incomplete submissions.
11:30 AM
You realize 12 applications are missing letters of recommendation — with the deadline in 4 days. You start manually emailing each reference.
12:10 PM
You download scoring spreadsheets from each judge and start recompiling them into a master sheet — only to find a broken formula and three judges with incomplete scores.
1:15 PM
The committee wants a list of finalists. You spend 90 minutes pulling data from the form tool into a spreadsheet and cleaning it.
2:30 PM
A rejected applicant calls asking why they weren't selected. You have no documented scoring rationale, no audit trail, and no way to show the decision was fair.
3:40 PM
A board member asks how last year's winners are doing. You have no idea — post-award tracking never happened. They ask if the program is worth continuing to fund.
4:30 PM
Six award recipients still haven't submitted acceptance forms or tax documents. A multi-year recipient is up for renewal but you don't know if they still qualify. There's no system to collect any of it.

5:58 PM
You're still at your desk. The awards go out next week. Nothing feels ready.
> Scroll through to read the story
7:48 AM
You open the application link. It's a long web form with dozens of questions, file uploads, and essay prompts. There's no login — just a page that warns not to refresh or close the browser.
8:16 AM
Halfway through the form you realize you need your transcript and supporting documents. You leave the page to find the files and hope the form doesn't reset.
8:42 AM
The application requires two letters of recommendation. You email your references asking if they can write one and hope they have time before the deadline.
10:03 AM
Your reference replies saying they can help but asks where the letter should be sent. You explain that you'll need the letter back so you can upload it into the application yourself.
11:18 AM
After nearly an hour of writing essay responses, the page refreshes and the form reloads. Your answers are gone. You start over.
1:07 PM
You finally submit the application. The page reloads with a short "Thank you for applying" message. No confirmation email arrives.
Three weeks later
You see a post announcing the winners. Your name isn't there.
9:12 AM
You email asking if your application was received. They reply saying they can't find your submission in the spreadsheet export.
11:48 AM
Your application was never reviewed. You were never considered for the opportunity.
> Scroll through to read the story
7:32 AM
An email arrives inviting you to serve as a reviewer. The message includes a link to a Google Drive folder and a scoring spreadsheet.
8:04 AM
Inside the Drive folder are dozens of subfolders — one for each applicant. Every folder contains PDFs, transcripts, essays, and supporting documents.
8:47 AM
You open the scoring spreadsheet. Each applicant has a row with several scoring categories. You start downloading applicant packets so you can review them one by one.
9:36 AM
The first few applicants take a while. You read every essay carefully and try to apply the rubric consistently.
10:58 AM
By the fifteenth applicant the process starts to blur together. The packets are long and the spreadsheet keeps growing.
12:41 PM
You notice applicant names, schools, and personal details throughout the materials. There's no way to conduct a blind review.
2:18 PM
You begin moving faster just to get through the remaining submissions. The first applicant you reviewed this morning would probably receive a different score if you saw them now.
4:06 PM
Some questions become harder to score consistently. What felt like a "7" earlier now feels like a "5."
5:12 PM
You finish scoring and email the spreadsheet back to the program administrator.
Two weeks later
You see the winners announced. You have no visibility into how the final decisions were made or how scores from different judges were combined.
Six months later
You're asked to volunteer as a reviewer again next year. You pause before responding. Your time is valuable. The process was inefficient, and you're not confident the selections were fair.
> Scroll through to read the story
Month 1
You commit to funding a program. You receive a short acknowledgment email thanking you for the contribution. The program launches, but you don't hear anything about how it's being managed.
Month 3
You ask for an update on the program. You're told applications were received and are currently "under review." You ask how many applicants applied. They say they'll check and get back to you.
Month 5
A recipient has been selected. You receive their name and a short bio. There's no insight into how many applicants applied, what the selection criteria were, or how the final decision was made.
Month 7
You start wondering how competitive the program was. Were there 20 applicants or 200? Was the process fair? There's no data to help answer the questions.
Month 9
You ask how the recipient is doing. The program officer says they'll reach out and see if they can provide an update.
Month 10
You receive a brief email: the recipient is "doing well." No details, no story, no measurable impact.
Month 12
Your board asks about the results of the program you funded. How many applicants? How were finalists selected? What difference did the award make? You don't have answers.
Year 2 - 10:15 AM
You're asked whether you'd like to renew funding. Without visibility into the process or evidence of impact, you decide not to continue funding the program.
There's a better way.
Meet Reviewr.
Replace the chaos with a single connected system — built for every person in the program lifecycle.
1

Less Energy. More Impact.

You're spending more time in spreadsheets than making impact. Reviewr replaces the patchwork of spreadsheets, form tools, email, and shared drives with one platform for your entire program lifecycle.

arrow_right
Complete program visibility — track every application, review stage, and deadline in a single operational dashboard
arrow_right
Automated workflows and reminders — keep applicants, references, and reviewers moving forward without manual follow-ups
arrow_right
Structured review and decision management — assign committees, manage scoring, and send award notifications in batches
arrow_right
Impact and compliance reporting — collect post-award updates and generate reports for leadership, donors, and boards
Dashboard for Empower Tomorrow Changemaker Program showing 370 days left, 21 total entries, supplemental form counts, submissions status, a timeline with milestones and deadlines from 2023 to 2027, and reviewer notes on submissions.
2

The Experience Applicants Deserve

The application should not be a barrier to success. Reviewr gives applicants a modern, guided experience with a living profile that follows them from application through post-award relationship.

arrow_right
Save progress and apply from anywhere — mobile-friendly applications with automatic save and resume
arrow_right
Simple reference collection — invite recommenders directly and track submissions without chasing emails
arrow_right
Clear status visibility — applicants always know what has been submitted, what is missing, and what happens next
arrow_right
A living applicant profile — documents, applications, and updates stay connected from submission through the post-award relationship
Online applicant form for Angie Quinn showing personal and academic information, with a question/comment section requesting a current transcript.
3

Efficient and Compliant Selections

Eliminate volunteer fatigue. Reviewr gives volunteer reviewers a structured environment where evaluating applicants is simple, consistent, and focused on the criteria that matter most. Everything reviewers need — applications, documents, and scorecards — lives in one streamlined workspace designed for fair, confident decisions.

arrow_right
Blind review capabilities — remove identifying information to help reduce unconscious bias
arrow_right
Structured scoring rubrics — guide reviewers with clear criteria and consistent evaluation standards
arrow_right
Score normalization across reviewers — balance scoring differences to ensure fair comparisons
arrow_right
All materials in one review workspace — applications, documents, notes, and scoring side-by-side for faster evaluation
Screenshot of an online submission form showing applicant Angie Quinn's personal and academic information, alongside a pop-up table listing submissions by David Rose, Don Draper, and Mary Richards with reviewer statuses and average scores.

Full Lifecycle Management

From submissions to impact reporting - Reviewr powers the full program lifecycle.

Build & Launch

Set up your program in hours, not weeks.

Design your program with custom forms, eligibility rules, and branded applicant portals — no IT required.

✦ Replaces: hours spent building forms in Google Forms or struggling with generic survey tools.
dynamic_form
Drag-and-Drop Form Builder
Conditional logic, file uploads, custom validation, save & resume
settings
Program Configuration
Multi-round phases, eligibility automation, deadlines, and capacity limits
auto_awesome
Branded Applicant Portal
Mobile-responsive, accessible, co-branding with your organization
mail
Automated Communications
Confirmation emails, deadline reminders, and status updates out of the box
Online form editor displaying a Student Information form with fields for name, address, email, phone, and date of birth, plus a popup to add a dropdown question type.
Collect Applications

Every application in one place — automatically.

Applicants submit directly through your portal. Recommendations, transcripts, and supporting docs are collected and organized automatically.

✦ Replaces: chasing missing documents via email, checking three folders, and manually compiling packets.
inbox
Centralized Submissions
All materials collected in one place — no inbox hunting
email
Reference Letter Tracking  
Automated reminders to recommenders with status visibility for your team
‍check_circle
Completeness Checks  
Flag incomplete applications before the deadline, not after
people
Applicant Messaging
Communicate directly with applicants inside the platform
User interface screen showing a Manage Submissions page with a list of applicants and a detailed popup of Angie Quinn's submission form with address, email, phone, and birth date.
Manage Operations

Your program command center.

Track submissions, manage reviewers, monitor progress, and stay on top of every detail — all from one centralized dashboard.

✦ Replaces: jumping between spreadsheets, email threads, and sticky notes to know what's happening.
‍stacked_bar_chart
Program Command Center
Real-time dashboard for managing all program logistics and tracking progress
assignment
Reviewer Assignment
Smart assignment, blind review, conflict-of-interest management
route
Workflow Management
Track phases, deadlines, and completion status across your program
auto_awesome
AI-Powered Tools
Summaries, plagiarism detection, and OCR to speed up operations
Dashboard for Empower Tomorrow Changemaker Program showing 370 days left, 21 total entries, supplemental forms counts, submission status counts, supplemental forms details, milestone timeline from 2024 to 2027, and reviewer notes on submissions.
Review and Score

Structured scoring. No more spreadsheet juggling.

Assign reviewers, share rubrics, and collect scores — all inside Reviewr. No downloading, no version conflicts, no chasing judges.

✦ Replaces: emailing PDFs to judges, downloading spreadsheets, recompiling broken formulas.
rule
Scoring Rubrics  
Standardized criteria shared with all reviewers — no confusion
assessment
Live Score Aggregation
See totals in real time — no recompiling spreadsheets
emoji_events
Decision Workflows
Score-based advancement, consensus scoring, and committee approvals
shield
Audit Trail
Full record of decisions, scores, and reviewer activity
Screenshot of a submission form with applicant's personal and academic information on the left and a reviewers' table with average scores on the right.
Post-Selection

Know how every recipient is doing. Always.

Track disbursements, collect impact reports, and build a living record of your program's outcomes — so you're never caught without an answer.

✦ Replaces: having no idea how past winners are doing because post-award tracking never happened.
attach_money
Disbursement Tracking  
Schedules, status, and compliance monitoring in one place
trending_up
Impact Collection
Ongoing updates from recipients — GPA, employment, milestones
assessment
Program Analytics
Real-time dashboards, exportable reports, year-over-year trends
check
This is some text inside of a div block.
Screenshot showing a grant reporting form with fields for project dates, description, status, and expenditures alongside a Grant Portfolio dashboard displaying total funds, allocated amounts, available funds, and details of three grant programs.
The right tools for the right Jobs

Feature Powered - Outcome Driven

From application to award, manage every stage with confidence.
The full suite of tools to manage the entire program lifecycle.
person
Applicant Experience

Delight applicants with intuitive, accessible portal

settings
Program Operations

Manage complex programs with ease

dynamic_form
Forms & Submissions

Build sophisticated forms without writing code

ads_click
Review & Selection

Ensure fair, unbiased evaluations at scale

auto_mode
Workflow & Automation

Automate repetitive tasks and save hours

chat_bubble_outline
Communication

Keep everyone informed automatically

insert_chart
Analytics & Reporting

Make data-driven decisions with confidence

auto_awesome
AI-Powered Tools

Work smarter with intelligent automation

workspace_premium
Post-Award Management

Work smarter with intelligent automation

manage_accounts
User Management

Control access with granular permissions

lock
Security & Compliance

Enterprise-grade protection you can trust

electric_bolt
Integrations

Connect seamlessly with your existing tools

See Reviewr In Action

See Reviewr In Action

See Reviewr In Action

See Reviewr In Action

See Reviewr In Action

See Reviewr In Action

Success Stories

Real Organizations. Real Results.

See how teams are transforming their programs with Reviewr
Case Study
Case Study: Army Scholarship Foundation

Powering Secure, Scalable, and Fair Scholarship Management with Reviewr

Scholarships
Non-Profits
Academia
Associations
Corporations
Foundations
Read More
arrow_forward
Case Study
Case Study: Black Data Processing Associates

Powering the High School Coding Competition with Reviewr

Competitions
Recognition Awards
Scholarships
Call for Entry
Academia
Corporations
Non-Profits
Read More
arrow_forward
Case Study
Case Study: American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine (AACOM)

Powering Research Grant Management with Reviewr

Grants
Competitions
Recognition Awards
Non-Profits
Academia
Foundations
Read More
arrow_forward

70% less work. 3x more impact.